What is the methodology of drawing conclusions from specific instances to broad generalizations called?

The methodology of drawing conclusions from specific instances to broad generalizations is known as inductive reasoning. This approach takes individual observations or specific cases and formulates broader generalizations or theories based on those observations.

Inductive reasoning is often used in scientific research and everyday decision-making, allowing for conclusions that reflect trends or patterns observed within a limited dataset. Unlike deductive reasoning, which starts with a general principle and moves towards a specific instance, inductive reasoning builds the general principle from multiple specific examples.

In the context of chiropractic philosophy, understanding how to apply inductive reasoning can help practitioners develop theories about patient responses or the effectiveness of different treatments based on their clinical experiences and outcomes observed in practice. This aligns with the chiropractic emphasis on the relationship between structure and function as it develops from specific instances observed in patient care and treatment efficacy.